FY 2026 NDAA: Key Procurement Reforms for Defense Contractors

January 27, 2026

By Paul Calabrese, Principal, Outsourced Accounting & Advisory Services

On December 18, 2025, the President signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (FY 2026 NDAA), paving the way for approximately $900 billion in funding for the Department of Defense (DoD) and other national security initiatives. A significant focus of this year’s NDAA is procurement reform, aimed at streamlining processes to accelerate delivery, raising thresholds for compliance under the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) and Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), and promoting the use of commercial purchasing to expand the defense industrial base.

Here are four noteworthy changes that defense contractors should pay attention to:

  • Transition to ‘best value’ evaluations for DoD contracts under the US General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule (MAS).
  • New deterrents for frivolous protests by incumbents at the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
  • Increased thresholds that lessen compliance burdens for TINA and CAS awards.
  • New exemptions for qualifying non-traditional defense contractors (NDCs).

Section 812 — Shifting to ‘Best Value’ for DoD MAS Purchases

Section 812 updates the competitive procedures for DoD procurements using the GSA MAS. The evaluation standard is changing from the “lowest overall cost alternative” to “best value.”

According to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), best value refers to the expected acquisition outcome that provides the greatest overall benefit based on the government’s assessment of the requirement.

This shift allows DoD buyers to consider technical merit, delivery, and risk alongside price, rather than defaulting to the lowest-cost option. However, it’s important to note that this change affects only DoD acquisitions. Civilian agencies will continue to follow the Title 41 MAS standard unless Congress makes further adjustments.

Section 875 — Addressing Baseless Incumbent GAO Protests

Section 875 directs the DoD to adopt Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) procedures that permit contracting officers to withhold up to 5% of payments from incumbent contractors who file a GAO protest for the sole purpose of extending a contract or bridge during the protest stay.

If the GAO dismisses a protest for lacking a reasonable legal or factual basis, the contractor may forfeit the withheld amount.

Contractors should carefully evaluate their decisions to protest, particularly in bridge extension situations, ensuring they have a solid legal or factual basis before proceeding. The financial implications of withholding payments mean that contractors must ensure they have a solid legal and factual basis before submitting a protest.

By adapting their protest strategies in light of these new rules, contractors can better position themselves for success while mitigating financial risks. This change encourages a more responsible and informed approach to the protest process, balancing the need for accountability with the realities of contract performance.

Higher Thresholds for TINA and CAS Requirements

The NDAA raises the threshold for TINA certified cost or pricing data from $2 million to $10 million for defense contracts entered into after June 30, 2026.

The NDAA also eliminates the $7.5 million trigger for CAS applicability, raising the modified CAS applicability threshold from $2 million to $35 million. Additionally, full CAS coverage has increased to $100 million (up from $50 million) as well as for filing CAS Disclosure Statements.

While CAS changes are set for January 1, 2028, the threshold increases will take effect within 180 days of enactment, or by June 26, 2026.

The increased thresholds for TINA and CAS requirements will significantly reduce compliance burdens for defense contractors. By raising financial limits, smaller contracts can avoid extensive pricing regulations, enabling more efficient resource allocation. This reform fosters a more agile contracting environment, promoting innovation and competition, particularly among small and non-traditional contractors. Ultimately, this expansion strengthens the defense industrial base and enhances the DoD’s responsiveness to national security needs.

Section 1826 — Compliance Carveouts for Nontraditional Defense Contractors (NDCs)

Section 1826 exempts qualifying NDCs from FAR Part 31 cost principles, certified cost or pricing data requirements, and various DoD business system rules, subject to limited waiver authority and congressional notification.

NDC status is defined by whether the contractor is not currently performing (and has not recently performed) a full CAS-covered contract.

Eligible contractors may find it easier to enter the market, as Section 1826 significantly reduces barriers for commercial contractors. Non-traditional defense contractors should be cautious about providing extensive cost or pricing data in their proposals.

Implementation Dates to Watch

Rule Description Deadline
CAS-Related Updates DFARS updates are due within 120 days of enactment, and CAS rule updates are due within 180 days April 17, 2026 and June 16, 2026, respectively
Bid Protest Withholding DoD is directed to issue implementing DFARS procedures within 180 days of enactment Mid-June 2026
Certified Cost or Pricing Data Threshold (TINA Threshold) Applies to contracts entered after June 30, 2026 n/a

What’s Missing: SBIR/STTR Reauthorization

It’s worth noting that the FY 2026 NDAA did not include reauthorization for Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer programs (SBIR/STTR), leaving stakeholders concerned about the ongoing lapse since October 1, 2025.

How to Turn Procurement Reform into a Competitive Edge

The recent changes in DoD MAS evaluations, higher pricing thresholds, and expanded exemptions for non-traditional contractors present new opportunities for defense contractors. By adapting early to these reforms, contractors can unlock fresh pathways to market and reduce legacy compliance hurdles.

Organizations that take a proactive approach through an NDAA impact assessment can convert evolving evaluation criteria into a competitive advantage. An NDAA impact assessment goes beyond checking boxes. It is a structured review of how new statutory and regulatory requirements affect a contractor’s go-to-market strategy, internal controls, pricing, past performance positioning, and proposal competitiveness. When applied thoughtfully, it helps contractors anticipate how DoD evaluators will assess risk and value—and respond before those expectations show up in a solicitation.

About GRF CPAs & Advisors

GRF CPAs & Advisors (GRF) provides tailored audit, tax, and advisory services that address the unique challenges and opportunities faced by government contractors. Our team offers deep expertise in the government contracting and defense sectors to align contracting strategy, pricing approach, and accounting infrastructure based on emerging acquisition rules.

By leveraging GRF’s experience and local market knowledge, government contractors can confidently navigate the complexities of the acquisition process and achieve their strategic goals. For more insights and guidance on navigating these changes, stay connected with us on LinkedIn and take advantage of our Resources Hub.

Contact